by Stanislava Ciurinskiene; photography by Stamen Manolov

A new law designed to fight runaway construction on the Black Sea coast leaves both environmentalists and investors dissatisfied

Snail House Boyana.jpg

For Bulgaria's Black Sea coast, 1 January 2008 was more than just the start of a new year; it was the beginning of a new era - at least on paper. On that date, the long-awaited Black Sea Coast Act came into effect. The controversial piece of legislation was intended to set out “public policy related to development and construction” in the Bulgarian Black Sea region. Its main goals are to secure the integrated development and preservation of the coast, to guarantee free public access to beaches and to assure the protection of the natural landscape. The law's opponents see it as a weapon for crushing free competition in the real estate sector. Its supporters hope that it will put an end to the construction frenzy that has turned some coastal regions into gigantic concrete Godzillas. More objective critics fear that its basic goal is to legitimise questionable practices and shady deals made over the last 17 years. One thing is clear, however - the law will have a noticeable effect on the investment climate on Bulgaria's Black Sea coast.

Chapter Three is one of the law's most hotly debated sections. It divides the coastal region into two zones, A and B.

Zone A includes territory located within 100 m, or 328 ft, of the beach. On the strand itself, solid fences are strictly forbidden and only moveable structures are allowed. Beyond the sand, however, construction is legal as long as it doesn't stand higher than 7.5 m, or 25 ft, or exceed 20 percent density.

Zone B includes territory within two km, or 1.2 miles, of Zone A. Here, too, new construction or expansion of existing structures is allowed as long as it obeys certain restrictions: a density of no more than 30 percent, a maximum intensity of 1.5, at least 50 percent landscaping, and a height of no more than 15 m, or 49 ft. You don't need to be a legal expert to realise that the law doesn't offer particularly effective protection for the most endangered Black Sea regions.

Large-scale investors who bought hundreds of acres of cheap agricultural land with the intention of changing their statute and building resort complexes are threatened by the fatal Article 13, Paragraph 2. It allows the expansion of construction only where the necessary technical infrastructure exists. If the basics of civilisation aren't already in place, then they can be built - at the investor's expense. Power supplies, water and sewage systems and roads require huge investments - so this clause effectively puts the kibosh on resort complexes in the middle of nowhere. Despite their infamous inaccessibility and iffy plumbing, more than a few such developments already exist.

Tourists can rejoice over Article 4, which decrees that Bulgaria's beaches are the exclusive property of the government. Better yet, Article 5 guarantees unrestricted and free-of-charge access to them. This should squash the unscrupulous practice of illegally collecting entrance fees to some beaches.

So far the law seems to be an attempt, however imperfect, to solve the ecological problems caused by the Black Sea building boom. Some Bulgarian MPs, however, obviously don't share this environmental enthusiasm, judging from the act's torturous history. The legislation took nearly the whole of Prime Minister Simeon Saxe-Coburg-Gotha's term to prepare and was introduced in early 2006. Parliament finally passed it in the middle of 2007. Immediately thereafter, MPs from the Movement for Rights and Freedoms, or DPS, introduced a motion to delay the act's implementation by six months. Their argument? It wasn't fair to investors who had bought 10,000 sq m of land under previous regulations to now be able to build on only 2,000 sq m of it. The motion passed and land owners rushed to acquire building permits before the new legislation came into force.

What scares preservationists most, however, is not the delay - which is already history - but the act's transitional and final provisions. According to these clauses, construction and development along the coast should follow regional development strategies, specialised construction schemes and town councils' general construction plans. However, the authors of these strategies can take their sweet time complying with the law - they have until 1 January 2010, two whole years after the law comes into force, to do so. What happens until then? Pessimists predict that during this two-year transition period unscrupulous investors will again discover loopholes in the law - with the help of customary kickbacks to bureaucrats and town council members, of course.

The law has yet another Achilles' heel. The transitory and final provisions require the owners of illegally constructed buildings on beaches to get rid of them within one month of the normative act coming into force. So in effect small cafés and souvenir stands will feel the law's heat. However, neither this act nor any other regulatory document provides an effective framework to guarantee the removal of illegal hotels and holiday villages built further way from beaches on protected territory or in violation of other ordinances. Examples of such illegal construction include several notorious hotels belonging to the heirs of assassinated “insurance” moguls.

The clauses concerning illegal structures appear to be little more than a formality. In recent years corruption has made legal construction easier than illegal building. So many hotels that should never have been issued permits in the first place will continue to “adorn” Bulgaria's Black Sea coast for decades to come. Obviously, the restrictive measures have come too late, as the most attractive plots have already been divvied up, bought and built up.

For now the law is nothing more than a framework allowing for the creation of hundreds more legislative acts designed to reign in out-of-control economic activity on the Black Sea coast. What does it mean for foreign investors? Above all, it means that if you purchase land in the special A and B zones, you'll need not only a good estate agent, but also an excellent lawyer. Any counsellor will need to read between the lines and imagine all possible scenarios stipulated by the law to protect clients from investment mistakes during the two-year transition period.

One thing is clear - anyone planning to invest in high-rise construction needs to refocus away from the coastline to regions further inland. Thanks to the new restrictions, demand for land located three to 10 km, or 1.9 to 6.2 miles, from the sea will increase, as will prices. Owners of apartments in buildings erected before the law came into effect can breathe easy - there's no risk of their investments being demolished. The law will gradually restrict construction and put an end to overbuilding. Changing land statutes from agricultural to regulated land suitable for construction will become decidedly more difficult in both zones.

Many environmentalists as well as ordinary citizens hope that the Black Sea Coast Act will not share the fate of much of Bulgaria's legislation that exists only on paper.


    Commenting on

    Vagabond Media Ltd requires you to submit a valid email to comment on to secure that you are not a bot or a spammer. Learn more on how the company manages your personal information on our Privacy Policy. By filling the comment form you declare that you will not use for the purpose of violating the laws of the Republic of Bulgaria. When commenting on please observe some simple rules. You must avoid sexually explicit language and racist, vulgar, religiously intolerant or obscene comments aiming to insult Vagabond Media Ltd, other companies, countries, nationalities, confessions or authors of postings and/or other comments. Do not post spam. Write in English. Unsolicited commercial messages, obscene postings and personal attacks will be removed without notice. The comments will be moderated and may take some time to appear on

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Discover More

Six months after the Covid-19 pandemic forced the world into lockdowns and uncertainties, a fuller picture of its effect on the world economy is beginning to emerge. Bulgaria fared not too bad, according to recent statistical data.

Nowhere is the abyss between what Boyko Borisov's GERB says it is doing and what it in fact does so obvious than in the economy of what firmly remains the EU's poorest state.

From bad to worse? According to a poll by Alpha Research published at the end of 2011, the majority of Bulgarians consider 2011 to have been "the worst" since the economic collapse of 1997.

In the third quarter of 2010 the average monthly income of an adult member of a family in Bulgaria decreased by 2.2 percent on a year earlier. At the moment it is 932 leva, or 466 euros, according to the National Statistical Institute.

The crisis was already a fact in Bulgaria at the beginning of 2009, but the owner of an accountancy firm in Gorna Oryahovitsa would deny it even more vehemently than then Prime Minister Sergey Stanishev.
Rays of hope have started to peep through the cloud-covered economic horizon – even in the new EU member states. Poland has managed to avoid going into recession.

At first, they stopped buying. Then it got worse - they started selling. Yes, it seems the British have deserted the Bulgarian property market and the Bulgarians are taking it very personally.
"The Bulgarian economy is stable." The words former Finance Minister Plamen Oresharski uttered in October 2008 seem more than just a little out of place a year later.

While last autumn the prevailing opinion of people in this country was that the economic crisis did not have a direct effect on them, their view is now completely different.

The commercial real estate market in Bulgaria is at a crossroads.
The "monster munch," as Londoners call the current credit crunch, in my view is running out steam. Everyone is growing tired of the pundits.
According to a saying very popular among Bulgarians in the past, "In his life, a man must do three things: raise a child, plant a tree and build a house for his family." Nowadays this way of thinking no longer reflects the urban lifestyle – the current rati