Fri, 03/04/2011 - 12:18

A surveillance scandal indicates the government's inability to cope with democracy – and the media's almost total subservience to whoever is in power

In recent months Bulgaria seems to have become an almost textbook example of what every freshman in media studies in the West should know by heart: the world is not what it is but what it appears to be on TV.

In 2011, Bulgaria is not what it is but what Prime Minister Boyko Borisov and his tried-and-tested lieutenant Interior Minister Tsvetan Tsvetanov tell the major TV channels it is.

The situation seems to have got so out of control that ordinary citizens are beginning to intone again the old post-Communist adage so many Bulgarians became used to during the early years of this country's uneasy transition to "democracy": "Circus Bulgaria."

At the heart of the most recent scandal is a series of Interior Ministry-ordered phone tappings that were leaked to a newspaper. In them various senior officials talk with each other ‒ and with their supreme boss, Boyko "Batte" Borisov himself. The chief of Bulgarian Customs was taped discussing obviously illicit deals, then Batte, meaning Big Brother, Boyko as he is lovingly called by his subjects, suddenly intervenes and orders the customs chief by telephone not to touch a particular entrepreneur, nicknamed Misho "The Beer," because he (the prime minister) had undertaken "certain commitments." The customs chief promptly complies.

Then Big Brother Boyko calls the chief of Sofia Airport customs and orders him to reappoint a football pal who has just been fired. The Sofia Airport boss obeys within the weekend...

Indicative of how this country is run? Many Bulgarians agree that the leaked tapes, in fact, contained nothing extraordinary. It has for long been an open secret that this government is by far more ruthless than its predecessors in protecting the individual economic and political interests of its members and cronies. But the real scandal is that few law enforcement officials ‒ and few branches of the media ‒ actually focused on what Boyko Borisov and his staff were heard saying. The main emphasis was put on how the tapes had been leaked.

Some probes ensued. An independent test commissioned by the newspaper in possession of the digitised recordings was conducted in France. It concluded that the voices were genuine. Then the government ordered another probe by local experts. The conclusion again was that, even though the recordings had been tampered with, the voices heard saying what they were saying were real.

The next step was a bomb blast in the early hours of a February morning. The target: the editorial offices of the newspaper which had run the material. Immediately, various officials, pundits and so on suggested that the editorial staff had planted the bomb themselves in order to attract attention to their newspaper. Tsvetan Tsvetanov, who is usually quick to appear on TV and make some pre-emptive remarks in cases ranging from medical negligence to wrongful arrests, was conspicuously absent from the scene of the crime. Many hours later he would assert that the number of bomb blasts of this sort had, in fact, decreased since the late 1990s, when Ivan Kostov, the man who started Bulgaria's post-Communist reforms in earnest, was prime minister.

All of this would have caused major resignations, sackings and court cases in any country with a free and independent media. But not so in Bulgaria. With the exception of some lesser newspapers not owned by the main print media grouping, which is known for its close relations with the government, as well as some smaller TV channels, all the main players, including the state-run TV and the main private TV station, resorted to some classic media techniques to de-focus the real events and divert the attention of the public the way Boyko Borisov's publicists wanted. The prime minister was repeatedly seen on TV playing down the scandals, his interior minister was everywhere rejecting "hearsay" that he had ordered the tappings himself. Conveniently, all of this happened against the background of the trouble in the Arab world, so much of the central newscasts' airtime was devoted to Hosni Mubarak and Muammar Al-Qadhafi instead of the personages pulling the strings in the EU's poorest member.

Bulgaria's media are very happy to indulge in the usual platitudes about the prime minister inaugurating sports grounds of kindergartens, just as the main task of the Communist period Bulgarian media was to show Communist leaders opening new collective farms and factories. They are also very happy to air alarmist reports about "killer doctors" and the reportedly corrupt judiciary. The cops are the good guys, the doctors and the judges aren't. This is the way Boyko Borisov and Tsvetan Tsvetanov, both former cops, want Bulgarians to see their country.

Of course the power relationship between those in government and the media is a lot more intricate in 2011 than it was in 1988. In 1988 the party bosses just picked up the phone and ordered the National Television anchors to air or not to air a report or an opinion. Now the media live in a mesh of, at times, extremely complicated economic and political interdependencies, which makes it impossible for any controversial inquiry to be broadcast by a major channel unless it has been approved by either those with the political might or by the advertising paymasters.

Sadly, in a situation like this even the biggest scandal will remain just a media squib, with no sackings or prosecutions to follow.

Issue 53-54

Commenting on

Vagabond Media Ltd requires you to submit a valid email to comment on to secure that you are not a bot or a spammer. Learn more on how the company manages your personal information on our Privacy Policy. By filling the comment form you declare that you will not use for the purpose of violating the laws of the Republic of Bulgaria. When commenting on please observe some simple rules. You must avoid sexually explicit language and racist, vulgar, religiously intolerant or obscene comments aiming to insult Vagabond Media Ltd, other companies, countries, nationalities, confessions or authors of postings and/or other comments. Do not post spam. Write in English. Unsolicited commercial messages, obscene postings and personal attacks will be removed without notice. The comments will be moderated and may take some time to appear on


Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Discover More

boyko borisov hospital
Most public opinion agencies got it wrong. Following a month of an exceptionally tepid (even in Bulgarian standards) election campaign, in which the coronavirus pandemic was hardly mentioned, Bulgarians went to the polls to elect their new parliament.

One of the topics debated in what was an exceptionally tepid election campaign was how Bulgarians abroad should be enabled to vote.
boyko borisov.jpg
Some media try to represent the upcoming election as a titanic battle of a major anti-Communist, pro-democracy and pro-Western establishment (Boyko Borisov's GERB) and a renegade leftist party (BSP, or Bulgarian Socialist Party) that stems from the erstwhil

Prof Dr Kosta Kostov, MD
Professor Kosta Kostov is one of Bulgaria's leading pulmonologists. He has specialised in Germany, Switzerland and the UK, and has taught for many years at the Medical Faculty of St Kliment of Ohrid University in Sofia.

In Bulgaria, Winston Churchill (who held southeastern Europe in contempt) is sometimes quoted as saying the Balkans have more history than they are able to stomach.

A circle of privileged companies formed around whoever happens to be in power? Construction of EU-funded guesthouses that in reality are luxurious private villas?

Things in Bulgaria are rarely what they seem to be, but of course there are exceptions. Look at Boyko Borisov's government and his most loyal GERB-ers.
A rare appearance: Ahmed Dogan after the 2009 general election
For the past 30 years there has been one unavoidable factor in Bulgarian politics: Ahmed Dogan and his DPS, or Movement for Rights and Freedoms.

Yet few expected something as dramatic as that: iPhone snaps of a half-naked prime minister sleeping across his bed, a bedside cupboard full of wads of 500-euro bills. Plus several gold ingots. Plus his favourite gun positioned on top.
Predictably, the coronavirus emergency has made all other events in what remains the EU's poorest and least free state look like insubstantial tidbits. With very few exceptions all media have focused exclusively on the alarmist pr
Since 13 March 2020 Bulgaria has been run by three generals and a sheriff. First and foremost comes General Ventsislav Mutafchiyski.
Political science students all over the world are being taught in the early stages of their studies that the best way for an authoritarian government – any authoritarian government – to enhance its own powers is to use a crisis – any crisis – as a justifica