by Anthony Georgieff

Media woes illustrate quality of Bulgarian democracy

Just after the fall of Communism in late 1989, the government-run Bulgarian media were in a state of both fear and anticipation. Having been a part of the state propaganda apparatus for so many years newspapers, television and radio stations feared the system of repression had not yet gone, but anticipated a forthcoming new one ‒ where freedom of speech would become a Constitutional right. Fear prevailed, however. News of mass pro-democracy rallies taking place in the centre of Sofia went unreported by local journalists. The general public in Bulgaria learned about them ‒ through dispatches sent out by BBC and other Western correspondents to London, Munich and New York, which were then re-broadcast by Bulgarian local media. News in those days did travel relatively fast, but its itinerary was rather complex.

In 2012, under Boyko Borisov, the situation is, of course, entirely different. Private TV and radio stations proliferate, and hundreds of local and national newspapers vie to survive in the Internet-dominated present. News becomes known instantly, if not through sleepy TV stations broadcasting pre-recorded programmes that can not be interrupted even by an earthquake, then through Facebook and Twitter. However, there is one important, almost literal parallel between 1989 and 2012. News, especially if it is sensitive and not too much to the liking of those in power, has to travel a long way.

Here is a case study. A Wikileaks report sent from Sofia by then American Ambassador John Beyrle stated in plain language: "Accusations in years past have linked [Prime Minister Boyko] Borisov to oil-siphoning scandals, illegal deals involving LUKoil and major traffic in methamphetamines. Information from SIMO tends to substantiate these allegations. Borisov is alleged to have used his former position as head of Bulgarian law enforcement to arrange cover for criminal deals, and his common-law wife, Tsvetelina Borislavova, is the manager of a large Bulgarian bank that has been accused of laundering money for organised criminal groups, as well as for Borisov's own illegal transactions. Borisov is said to have close social and business ties to influential Mafia figures, including Mladen Mihalev (AKA "Madzho"), and is a former business partner of OC figure Roumen Nikolov (AKA "the Pasha").

The above paragraph is listed as 06SOFIA647 on and its existence in Bulgaria was reported by Bivol, an Internet site that represents itself as the partner of Wikileaks in Bulgaria. From Bivol, the report was picked up by other domestic media.

As a matter of policy, the US Government does not comment on Wikileaks reports, so any attempts by Bulgarian journalists to extract further information about their prime minister in this way would have been in vain.

However, the breakthrough came in Germany, where Tageszeitung, a major daily, quoted a former CIA head that SIMO was an "administrative term" for the Central Intelligence Agency (and as such "should not have been used in the cables").

From here on it transpires that the CIA did in fact hold sensitive information linking the current Bulgarian prime minister to organised crime, but never disclosed it to Bulgarian prosecutors who, at least in theory, should order further investigations. Instead, the American Embassy is giving Boyko Borisov, who says he is pro-Western in general and pro-American in particular, all the support he needs for his internal and external policies.

Putting two and two together would have resulted in an interesting media story in any country whose prime minister was implicated in this way, one might have thought. Not so in Bulgaria.

According to research conducted by one of the journalists involved with Bivol, the news was picked up by the Deutsche Welle Bulgarian-language Internet site and then published by the BGNES news agency in Bulgarian and by the Novinite site in English. There was no such story on TV. Neither state-run BTA, nor private news agency Focus reported it. No radio broadcast it. There was no such story in the newspapers (with three exceptions). Now add two and two together again, and see whether such media behaviour is "normal" in a state that, on the one hand, is still reeling in the woes of Post-Communism, yet on the other is a full member of the EU.

As in the course of the past three years Bulgaria has persistently been put at the rock bottom of international freedom-of-the-press indices and surveys, both European and American, the EU decided to act. At a hearing in Brussels organised by the Liberal Group of the European Parliament, several Bulgarian reporters testified about the repressions they had personally had to endure in Bulgaria, as well as about the more general issues surrounding the limited freedoms of the domestic media.

Ivo Siromahov, a member of the Slavi's Show team of scriptwriters, said that the relationship between the media and the government in general and the media and the prime minister in particular evoked the attitude of the Communist-era newspapers to dictator Todor Zhivkov.

Yavor Dachkov, a journalist, added that in Bulgaria the government put both direct and indirect pressure on the media. The newspaper Dachkov worked for, Galeriya, had brought out clandestine recordings of telephone calls in which Prime Minister Boyko Borisov ordered the chief of customs, Vanyo Tanov, to discontinue tax probes into the business of a local entrepreneur. The prosecutors never acted on the tapped calls, though they were deemed to be genuine. Instead, the entrepreneur in question died in a hotel room shortly after the scandal, and a bomb was planted in front of Galeriya's editorial offices. The blast did not kill anyone but caused significant damage. The case remains unsolved.

Stanimir Ilchev, a Bulgarian MEP, said Bulgaria has become "increasingly autocratic," which allowed the "proliferation of servility" ‒ bringing this country "in line with states like Mongolia, East Timor and Senegal."

Dutch politician Neelie Kroes, the current EU commissioner for digital agenda, personally oversaw the hearing and said she took it upon herself to watch Bulgaria closely. "Fight, I will defend you!" she told the Bulgarian attendees.

Still, the question remains how smaller and independent media outside the large media groups in Bulgaria can fight against the huge apparatus of the state and its propaganda channels.

Nebulous ownership of the media and the lack of proper legislation to guarantee freedom of speech, especially for print media, are of course major problems, but they are just the tip of the iceberg. As one observer put it, the situation in Bulgaria can be characterised by covert state financing for docile media ‒ mainly through advertising contracts, which in these cash-strapped times are mainly EU, and the integration of the political establishment with the self-styled Bulgarian system of oligarchs. The at times monstrously intricate network of personal likes and dislikes, of political preferences or negations, of under-the-table deals with politicians and "businessmen" have rendered the media toothless and dependent on handouts. According to another Wikileaks cable, Prime Minister Boyko Borisov is directly involved in this, offering cash payments for favourable media coverage and directly threatening the disobedient.

The lack of free and independent media in Bulgaria is also indicative of the quality of democracy in this country. Without free media you cannot have free and fair elections, and without free and fair elections you cannot have a democracy ‒ and democracy in all cases needs a strong and well-fed media watchdog. Sadly, in Bulgaria that watchdog is at the moment just a poodle being (sometimes) fed on juicy government steaks.

Unless the power of the media watchdog is reinstalled fast and without prejudice, the return of the practices of late 1989 may become irreversible. Then the World Service of the BBC and Radio Free Europe will find themselves having to reintroduce their Bulgarian-language broadcasts in order to inform Bulgarians what is happening in the centre of Sofia. Otherwise, fear will become permanent and anticipation will disappear.


    Commenting on

    Vagabond Media Ltd requires you to submit a valid email to comment on to secure that you are not a bot or a spammer. Learn more on how the company manages your personal information on our Privacy Policy. By filling the comment form you declare that you will not use for the purpose of violating the laws of the Republic of Bulgaria. When commenting on please observe some simple rules. You must avoid sexually explicit language and racist, vulgar, religiously intolerant or obscene comments aiming to insult Vagabond Media Ltd, other companies, countries, nationalities, confessions or authors of postings and/or other comments. Do not post spam. Write in English. Unsolicited commercial messages, obscene postings and personal attacks will be removed without notice. The comments will be moderated and may take some time to appear on

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Discover More

In the 1990s and early 2000s Bulgaria, a former East bloc country, was an enthusiastic applicant to join both NATO and the EU. Twenty years later the initial enthusiasm has waned.

Тo understand the current predicament of the Changes Continued political party, one of whose leaders, Kiril Petkov, was prime minister in 2021-2022, one needs to consider the characteristically complicated background.

In spite of the protestations of the ruling "fixture" between PP-DB (Changes Continued of Kiril Petkov and Asen Vasilev and Democratic Bulgaria of Gen Atanas Atanasov and Hristo Ivanov) and Boyko Borisov's GERB about the "top national pri

While Bulgarians left, right and centre are quibbling over the fate of a pile of stones crowned by some sculpted Red Army soldiers in central Sofia, the state prosecution service quietly terminated a case started by Vasil Bozhkov, one of this country's weal

Polling agencies got it wrong again

Colourful and gilt-domed, looking like a toy, the St Nicholas the Miracle-Worker church in central Sofia is known to Bulgarians simply as the Russian Church.

Notwithstanding the amendments to the Constitution proposed by Nikolay Denkov's "fixture" (the word he uses to describe the government), several bits of legislation put forward by the rulers and quickly voted into law have raised eyebrows and prompted a sig

А crudely-cut cartoon circulating on social media shows Former Foreign Minister Solomon Pasi, who is Jewish, being held by two Nazi-clad soldiers. The text (in Bulgarian) reads: "If you don't want Russian gas, we will give you some of ours."

In 2013, when the Inland Revenue agency started a probe into alleged wrongdoing by then President Rosen Plevneliev, he famously excused himself: I am not a Martian. Plevneliev had been a minister for Boyko Borisov.

Three years after the event, the massive street protests that blocked the traffic in Central Sofia in the course of months, in 2020, seem to have achieved their original aims.
If anyone believed that the CC-DB, or Changes Continued-Democratic Bulgaria alliance, who lost the April election and are now the second largest party in the Bulgarian National Assembly, were serious in their declared and oft-repeated pledges they wanted to

Despite the massive and apparently rather expensive advertising campaign, which involved TV, print, outdoor and plenty of Facebook, the Changes Continued-Democratic Bulgaria (CC-DB) alliance lost the 2 April election.