NEIGHBOURING BULLY

NEIGHBOURING BULLY

Wed, 10/01/2008 - 10:02

Europe, Bulgaria included, must understand that its biggest security threat apart from Al-Qa'ida is Russia

russia25.jpg
© BTA

Recent years have seen a number of objects wither and become extinct, just like the Jura dinosaurs. Not too long ago a friend went to his local post office in Kinlochewe, Scotland, to post a letter. He duly addressed the envelope with his fountain pen and asked for some blotting paper. "Blotting paper?" the young Indian girl behind the counter asked. Around her neck hung the latest (well, at the time) version of the iPod.

Likewise with professions. Have you seen your typist recently? Your switchboard operator? Do you know what a switchboard means? A mettre-en-page?

But curiously, some professions keep coming back. In recent months we have seen the return of the Kremlinologists.

The Kremlinologists, or Sovietologists as some used to call them, were the guys during the Cold War who had to read between the lines of what the Warsaw Pact propaganda machine was disseminating. They were needed by Western governments and think tanks to make sense of the inner workings of what in effect was an extremely opaque and extremely centralised form of government, the one of the Brezhnevs and the Gromykos. Lack of independent and reliable information forced the West to use the tiniest tidbits, such as removal of portraits, the rearranging of chairs, positions at the reviewing stand for parades in Red Square, and other indirect signs to try to understand what was really happening in internal Soviet politics.

When you read the new Russian foreign policy doctrine in 2008 you certainly need a good Kremlinologist to decipher.

Against the background of Russia's recent invasion of Georgia, Russian President Dmitriy Medvedev (means "Bear" in Russian, pun unintended) asserted that the principles of his "new" foreign policy did not indicate Russia's waging or countering a new Cold War, but upholding its "national interests."

These include the "recognition" and respect for the "basic principles of international law"; the notion that the world should be "multi-polar" as unipolarity is "unacceptable and impermissible" even if it is directed by "such a serious and authoritative country as the United States of America"; the idea that Russia should not be in "isolation" and should conduct dialogue with the United States and "other countries of the world"; the need for Russia to "unquestionably protect the life and dignity of its citizens wherever they are" – OK, with the warning that "it should be clear to everyone that if anyone makes aggressive forays, he will get a response"; and establish spheres of influence where Russia has its "privileged interests."

Kremlinologists would indeed read between the lines.

Russia was a signatory to the April 2008 UN Security Council resolution that reaffirmed the integrity of Georgia. It invaded Georgia a few months later, justifying its decision by claiming that its citizens were attacked by Georgia. But who undertakes unilateral action against a sovereign state if he believed in international law? At the time of the "hot" conflict, Russia made – and still makes – numerous promises which it has no intention of keeping. Obviously, this kind of behaviour evokes 1975 when Russia became a signatory to the Helsinki Final Act and immediately thereafter tightened the lid on its own citizens.

By saying Russia is opposed to the supremacy of the United States (and the Allies, amongst which are Britain and, yes, now Bulgaria) Russia in fact gives a blunt warning against the expansion of NATO and the EU into Ukraine and Georgia.

Russia wasn't particularly happy to see NATO and the EU in Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia either, nor was it particularly enchanted when Bulgaria, its closest ally in the former Warsaw Pact, fled the Socialist Camp coop.

But the Russia talking now is not the Russia of the 1990s. Putin, the KGB and the oil barons are very much in power, and the EU's naive short-sightedness has permitted them to make significant parts of Europe, including Bulgaria, dependent on Russian energy. Russia knows that even if Georgia and Ukraine were to be accepted in NATO, NATO would be unlikely to go to war with it over Ossetia or Crimea; nor would the EU support any such action for fear Russia would shut down the oil tap.

However, despite the gas and oil, Russia counts on the EU as much as the EU counts on Russia. In a free market world selling goods is a bilateral act, and if Russia misbehaves too much, it could easily find itself unable to sell its "huge" reserves of oil to the EU market, certainly its most lucrative.

Russia needs Europe as much as Europe needs Russia. And if Russia bullies Europe over Georgia, the EU must strike back – not with guns, but with sanctions, suspended contracts, frozen assets and alternative deals.

Under its current president and government, Bulgaria is unlikely to take a definite stand on the issue because it still wants to act as a "bridge" between the West and the East. The Russians as a nation continue to be very popular in Bulgaria despite the legacies of Communism. The government is spending money to promote 2008 as "The Year of Russia in Bulgaria," and the president is always seen in attendance whenever there is some provincial "festival" celebrating Russian culture. But sooner rather than later Bulgaria must realise that Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov means no joke when he divides the world into a near-abroad and all the others. Bulgaria is obviously within the area in which Russia considers itself having a "privileged interest." Unless it does something, Bulgaria may soon find itself again in the position of a "privileged" vassal – getting oil but also being told what to do.

Issue 25

Commenting on www.vagabond.bg

Vagabond Media Ltd requires you to submit a valid email to comment on www.vagabond.bg to secure that you are not a bot or a spammer. Learn more on how the company manages your personal information on our Privacy Policy. By filling the comment form you declare that you will not use www.vagabond.bg for the purpose of violating the laws of the Republic of Bulgaria. When commenting on www.vagabond.bg please observe some simple rules. You must avoid sexually explicit language and racist, vulgar, religiously intolerant or obscene comments aiming to insult Vagabond Media Ltd, other companies, countries, nationalities, confessions or authors of postings and/or other comments. Do not post spam. Write in English. Unsolicited commercial messages, obscene postings and personal attacks will be removed without notice. The comments will be moderated and may take some time to appear on www.vagabond.bg.

0 comments

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Discover More

pro-russia rally bulgaria
IS PUTIN 'WORLD LEADER' OR SADISTIC VILLAIN?
Russia's invasion of Ukraine has polarised public opinion in Bulgaria. In fact, Bulgaria has emerged, since the start of the war in Ukraine, as the only EU state where public support for Putin remains high.

anti ukraine protest bulgaria.jpg
WHY DO SO MANY BULGARIANS SUPPORT PUTIN?
Perhaps surprisingly for a country that was once an enthusiastic applicant to join NATO and the EU Bulgaria is now home to a significant number of people who support... Russia's tyrant Vladimir Putin and his war in Ukraine.

Satan strategic nuclear-head missile, capable of reaching the island of Manhattan in 20-30 minutes after launch
WHAT BULGARIANS GET WRONG ABOUT WAR IN UKRAINE
Though it has been a member of NATO since 2004 and of the EU since 2007 present-day Bulgaria appears not to be very enthusiastic about any involvement in the war in Ukraine.

king samuil statue bulgaria
BIG MACEDONIAN QUESTION
The "Macedonian Question" is one of those Balkan conundrums that even outsiders with more than just passing knowledge of the history and geography of the region can have trouble understanding.

KEY TAKEAWAYS FROM BULGARIAN 2-IN-1 ELECTIONS
As the dust settles down after Bulgaria's third attempt in a year to elect a government and as the post-election horse-trading begins, there are several key conclusions to be drawn from Boyko Borisov's dramatic downfall and the emergence of the Changes Cont
REFORMS TO BE CONTINUED?
During 2021 Bulgarians have so far gone to the polls twice, in April and in July. On both occasions the sort of parliament they elected was so split that it failed to form a government.
police brutality bulgaria 2020
BULGARIAN POLITICS
What many Bulgarians have known all along ever since the collapse of Communism – that the police force, formerly known as People's Militia has hardly reformed itself during the past 30 years – became painfully obvious with the broadcast, in the house of par

boyko borisov wanted
BORISOV'S DOWNFALL?
Some analysts were surprised, others were not: the 11 July snap election, called in the wake of the failure of Bulgaria's 45th National Assembly to set up a government, returned more or less the same results.

WHERE TO FROM NOW ON?
The month of June, officially the election campaign month ahead of the early ballot scheduled for 11 July, has been extraordinary even in the standard of Bulgarian politics.
WILL BOYKO BE GONE FOR GOOD?
Following the failure of Bulgaria's "short" parliament, which sat for less than a month, to fulfil its basic constitutional duty, form a functioning government, President Rumen Radev stepped in and appointed a caretaker administration.
boyko borisov hospital
BULGARIA'S BALLOT SHOWDOWN
Most public opinion agencies got it wrong. Following a month of an exceptionally tepid (even in Bulgarian standards) election campaign, in which the coronavirus pandemic was hardly mentioned, Bulgarians went to the polls to elect their new parliament.

TO VOTE OR NOT TO VOTE?
One of the topics debated in what was an exceptionally tepid election campaign was how Bulgarians abroad should be enabled to vote.