PRO BONO PUBLICA

PRO BONO PUBLICA

Sat, 09/01/2007 - 18:11

The released Bulgarian nurses get tangled up in a media circus, but the newspapers don’t ask the important questions

bulgarian nurses libya.jpg

It seemed like the ending of a World Cup Championship where the Bulgarian boys had scored against Germany. National euphoria surrounded the five women and two men as they descended from a French aircraft at Sofia Airport. Even the hard-bitten wept as the longsuffering detainees fell into the arms of their loved ones.

It was the hottest day of the year but Bulgaria's establishment, bedecked in dark suits, lined the scorched tarmac, perhaps eager to bask in the plaudits and the reflected glory.

The country seemed to forget its problems. Prime Minister Sergey Stanishev, quick to capitalise on what he hoped would be a renewed mood of optimism, said the nation had “regained its selfconfidence”. Bulgaria dominated the world's front pages and, for once, for reasons unconnected to crime, corruption, baby smuggling, poverty or other ills.

The saga began eight years ago when Bulgarian nurses Christiana Valcheva, Nasya Nenova, Valentina Siropulo, Valya Chervenyashka and Snezhana Dimitrova, Dr Zdravko Georgiev and Palestinian Dr Ashraf Al-Hajuj were accused of deliberately infecting 400 Libyan children with the HIV virus. Six years later, Dr Georgiev was acquitted but the rest were pronounced guilty and sentenced to death. The judgment, relying on confessions extracted under torture, met with international condemnation. Yet all Libyan law courts upheld the death penalty verdict and rejected appeals.

The sentences were not carried out. Libyan President Muammar Al-Qadhafi commuted them to life imprisonment and honoured a bilateral agreement with Bulgaria stipulating that nationals of one state, convicted of crimes in the other, can serve sentences at home. So it was that the nurses returned to a triumphant reception in Sofia. Minutes after they set foot on home soil, President Georgi Parvanov granted them a full pardon.

The story captured the world's imagination. A novel based on the events has already been published. Plans were unveiled for a movie about the nurses' story. And what better ending for such a picture than the nurses' emotional and cathartic return? This is just where a largescale government, political and corporate PR campaign took over.

Most of the media attention – and a lucrative arms deal – went to France. The nurses were released during French first lady Cécilia Sarkozy's visit to Libya. The next day, the newly elected French president visited Tripoli, ostensibly to finalise an arrangement for the construction of a nuclear-powered desalination plant. A week later, however, it emerged that Libya was to acquire Milan anti-tank missiles and an advanced communications system from France.

Did the Bulgarian nurses figure in a quid pro quo deal with Libya? Until its recent decision to abandon a nuclear programme, the North African regime had been a pariah state and viewed as an international terrorist sponsor.

French Defence Minister Hervé Morin rejected such speculation, pointing out that negotiations with Libya had been conducted over two or three years and concluded in February, before Sarkozy's presidency. Yet Saif Al-Islam, Al-Qadhafi's son, told Le Monde and Newsweek that a deal had been struck involving the nurses, French arms and the possible extradition from Britain of Abdel Al-Megrahi, convicted of the 1988 Lockerbie bombing.

Bulgarian President Parvanov was the uncontested star in the media circus. As soon as Foreign Minister Ivaylo Kalfin began reading the pardon at the nurses' first press conference, he made a surprise appearance. Traditionally, Bulgarian presidents delegate the act of pardon to the vice president. Parvanov had previously conformed to this protocol. But, in this case, he usurped Vice President Angel Marin's office. Intentionally or not, the timing of this dramatic gesture quelled discussion of the fact that he had lied about his past as a Communist-era State Security informer.

On the very same day, state agencies and corporations began showering the nurses with presents. Hotels and travel agencies offered their services to help them recover from the nightmare of Libyan jails. Defence Minister Veselin Bliznakov put the Military Medical Academy at their disposal for tests and the MoD sanatoriums for their relaxation – at the expense of the Council of Ministers. But the nurses had already been offered to stay in the Boyana government residence.

Some medical centres offered employment to the nurses after Health Minister Radoslav Gaydarski confirmed that they had not lost their professional licences as a result of the prolonged period of non-practice.

Neither the minister nor the prospective employers offered to help the nurses catch up with developments in medicine during the past eight years. But Boyko Borisov, Sofia's mayor and unofficial leader of Citizens for the European Development of Bulgaria (GERB) promised computer courses for the nurses and Bulgarian language classes for the Palestinian doctor.

The Bulgarian Physicians' Union confined itself to opening bank accounts for the nurses where people could send donations. Private corporations did much more – and did so conspicuously. Mobile operator M-Tel presented each of the nurses with a luxury flat. Todor Batkov, the owner of the Standart daily, gave each a bank account with 10,000 leva. The newspaper, along with television channel bTV and Darik Radio, had organised the “You Are Not Alone” ribbon campaign for the nurses' release. The ribbon doubled as an advertising logo, appearing on dairy products and planes belonging to a Bulgarian air carrier.

The Council of Ministers also gave each medical worker 10,000 leva as part of a one-off donation to help them get settled. Stanishev and Kalfin were careful to point out that this was not unprecedented. Similar aid was given to the relatives of the 17 victims of the tragic accident near Byala in December last year.

But, as so often, financial issues sullied the human drama. Snezhana Dimitrova's son, Ivaylo Nikolchevski, was dissatisfied with the 10,000 leva offer. He said that the state should take the initiative and not wait to be solicited before compensating the nurses. According to European practice, victims of wrongful imprisonment are awarded between 35 and 45 euros for each day's imprisonment. Taking 40 euros as the average amount, this means that the state owed the nurses and Al-Hajuj 117,000 euros each for their eight years in jail.

Nothing came of this demand, which elicited few comments from the media. However, Bulgaria waived the nearly $56.6 million owed by Libya and donated it to the Benghazi International Fund for the treatment of HIV-infected children and to the modernisation of medical facilities.

The big losers from all this media attention could be the nurses themselves. Financial compensation and public assistance have roused resentment in some Bulgarians – not least because they coincided with a 10 percent rise in food prices and the possible introduction of a flat income tax.

Significantly, no Bulgarian media took up any serious investigation of where the money to release the nurses had come from. All Bulgarian officials, including Parvanov – hailed as the mastermind of the operation and the chief saviour of the nurses – asserted that Bulgaria had not contributed a penny to ensure the nurses' release. Some questions were asked, but they were brushed off - and the hacks didn't pursue the matter. What provokes a tremendous scandal in France fails to raise a murmur in Bulgaria...

This is strangely reminiscent of the dark days of Communist Durzhavna sigurnost, or State Security, informers, when Sofia residents learned about what was happening in the centre of their city from BBC World Service broadcasts. Perhaps the BBC should do it again? It would become immensely popular in Bulgaria if it supplied concrete answers about the money, but perhaps this time around it should inform the police before starting to ask questions.

Issue 12

Commenting on www.vagabond.bg

Vagabond Media Ltd requires you to submit a valid email to comment on www.vagabond.bg to secure that you are not a bot or a spammer. Learn more on how the company manages your personal information on our Privacy Policy. By filling the comment form you declare that you will not use www.vagabond.bg for the purpose of violating the laws of the Republic of Bulgaria. When commenting on www.vagabond.bg please observe some simple rules. You must avoid sexually explicit language and racist, vulgar, religiously intolerant or obscene comments aiming to insult Vagabond Media Ltd, other companies, countries, nationalities, confessions or authors of postings and/or other comments. Do not post spam. Write in English. Unsolicited commercial messages, obscene postings and personal attacks will be removed without notice. The comments will be moderated and may take some time to appear on www.vagabond.bg.

0 comments

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Discover More

pro-russia rally bulgaria
IS PUTIN 'WORLD LEADER' OR SADISTIC VILLAIN?
Russia's invasion of Ukraine has polarised public opinion in Bulgaria. In fact, Bulgaria has emerged, since the start of the war in Ukraine, as the only EU state where public support for Putin remains high.

anti ukraine protest bulgaria.jpg
WHY DO SO MANY BULGARIANS SUPPORT PUTIN?
Perhaps surprisingly for a country that was once an enthusiastic applicant to join NATO and the EU Bulgaria is now home to a significant number of people who support... Russia's tyrant Vladimir Putin and his war in Ukraine.

Satan strategic nuclear-head missile, capable of reaching the island of Manhattan in 20-30 minutes after launch
WHAT BULGARIANS GET WRONG ABOUT WAR IN UKRAINE
Though it has been a member of NATO since 2004 and of the EU since 2007 present-day Bulgaria appears not to be very enthusiastic about any involvement in the war in Ukraine.

king samuil statue bulgaria
BIG MACEDONIAN QUESTION
The "Macedonian Question" is one of those Balkan conundrums that even outsiders with more than just passing knowledge of the history and geography of the region can have trouble understanding.

KEY TAKEAWAYS FROM BULGARIAN 2-IN-1 ELECTIONS
As the dust settles down after Bulgaria's third attempt in a year to elect a government and as the post-election horse-trading begins, there are several key conclusions to be drawn from Boyko Borisov's dramatic downfall and the emergence of the Changes Cont
REFORMS TO BE CONTINUED?
During 2021 Bulgarians have so far gone to the polls twice, in April and in July. On both occasions the sort of parliament they elected was so split that it failed to form a government.
police brutality bulgaria 2020
BULGARIAN POLITICS
What many Bulgarians have known all along ever since the collapse of Communism – that the police force, formerly known as People's Militia has hardly reformed itself during the past 30 years – became painfully obvious with the broadcast, in the house of par

boyko borisov wanted
BORISOV'S DOWNFALL?
Some analysts were surprised, others were not: the 11 July snap election, called in the wake of the failure of Bulgaria's 45th National Assembly to set up a government, returned more or less the same results.

WHERE TO FROM NOW ON?
The month of June, officially the election campaign month ahead of the early ballot scheduled for 11 July, has been extraordinary even in the standard of Bulgarian politics.
WILL BOYKO BE GONE FOR GOOD?
Following the failure of Bulgaria's "short" parliament, which sat for less than a month, to fulfil its basic constitutional duty, form a functioning government, President Rumen Radev stepped in and appointed a caretaker administration.
boyko borisov hospital
BULGARIA'S BALLOT SHOWDOWN
Most public opinion agencies got it wrong. Following a month of an exceptionally tepid (even in Bulgarian standards) election campaign, in which the coronavirus pandemic was hardly mentioned, Bulgarians went to the polls to elect their new parliament.

TO VOTE OR NOT TO VOTE?
One of the topics debated in what was an exceptionally tepid election campaign was how Bulgarians abroad should be enabled to vote.